Showing posts with label agave. Show all posts
Showing posts with label agave. Show all posts

Guest Post By Stephen Richards, Xagave CEO

To further refute Dr. Mercola's fact-less claims about Agave, Stephen Richards the CEO of Xagave takes on Dr. Mercola's Article point by point.

We have recently had a number of people contact us regarding the Mr. Mercola article. His article is truly unfortunate and misguided. Below you will find a point by point showing just how incorrect his claims are. I believe in making claims based upon legitimate, objective, number based criteria and it is clear that Mr. Mercola does not. I cannot speak for all agave nectar but I can speak about Xagave, which is a premium blend of Agave Salmiana (white agave) and inulin from agave tequilana. The simple fact is that Xagave is a versatile, low-glycemic sweetener that can be used for cooking, canning and baking and will save a significant number of calories when used. The calories savings comes from both reduced sugar amounts and reduced fat. This is discussed below. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me and you may reprint this information in your blogs. I address each of his issues on a point by point basis below.

1. Mr. Mercola claims that agave is process from the "starch" of the agave plant and thus the same process is used to derive fructose as HFCS. Here is what he states:
"In spite of manufacturer’s claims, agave "nectar" is not made from the sap of the yucca or agave plant but from the starch of its pineapple-like root bulb. The root is comprised mainly of starch, similar to corn, and a complex carbohydrate called inulin, which is made up of fructose molecules. The process by which agave starch and inulin are converted into "nectar" is VERY similar to the process by which cornstarch is converted into HFCS1."
Response: This is absolutely not true. There is no starch in the agave plant. The agave plant contains fructans including inulin. This prebiotic fiber breaks down into two sugars, fructose and glucose when heated. This is a simple, chemical-free process,very different from the conversion of corn starch to fructose. Remember that corn has no fructose in it, just starch and the starch must be converted through a chemical process to create fructose. This is just not the case with agave. Specifically with Xagave, the fructans are broken down into sugars by introducing GMO-free, organically certified enzymes; thus no heat is used in the process and hence the "Raw".

2. Mr. Mercola claims that the process utlizes genetically modified organisms and various chemical agents. Here is what he says:
"The agave starch is converted into fructose-rich syrup using genetically modified enzymes and a chemically intensive process involving caustic acids, clarifiers, and filtration chemicals"
Response: In this regard, I cannot speak for all agave nectars. With respect to Xagave, we have a GMO free certificate on file and our product is USDA Organically certified as well as Bioagricert Certified (the European equivalent of USDA Organic Certification). In short, there are no genetically modified organisms or chemicals used in the processing of Xagave brand agave nectar. Conversely, HFCS cannot get an organic certification.

3. Mr. Mercola that there are different colors of agave and the differing colors is a result of poor quality. His statement is as follows:
"Due to poor quality control in Mexican processing plants, some of the syrup gets burnt Hence, the darker amber color. Of course, this poor quality control is marketed as an "artisan" variation, like amber beer, when in fact it contains higher levels of toxic impurities that arise from the sugar-heating process."
Response. There are different colors or shades of agave -- light, amber and dark. It is true that the darker the shade, the longer it has been processed, which brings out a stronger agave flavor with honey-nutty-flowery notes to it. It is by no means "burnt" as if it is an accident or under poor quality control situations. This last statement truly shows the ignorance of Mr. Mercola and the statements that he is making. Specifically with respect to Xagave, it is processed in a facility that meet USDA organic certification and European certification requirements. The facility meets Kosher certification, in fact the highest level of Kosher certification which is "Passover certification". It is of the highest quality and I have personally visited the facility several times and reviewed the process. I find Mr. Mercola's comments baseless, demeaning and full of racial overtones.

4. Mr. Mercola claims that agave is bad for you because of it high fructose content and not other nutritional value. He states:
"While agave syrup does have a low-glycemic index, so does antifreeze -- that doesn’t mean it’s good for you. Agave syrup has the highest fructose content of any commercial sweetener -- ranging from 70 to 97 percent, depending on the brand, which is FAR HIGHER than high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), which averages 55 percent"
Response: Besides the utterly ridiculous analogy in which the statement is made, Mr. Mercola again shows his ignorance in hyperbole. Again, I cannot speak for all agaves, but specifically with respect to Xagave, it is comprised of 47% fructose, 17% glucose, 12% inulin, with the balance being water containing vitamins and minerals. Xagave's fructose content is lower than sugar, lower than HFCS and is about the same as honey and Xagave has less total sugars than all these sweeteners. Here is a chart for comparison:

Sweetener Comparison Chart

Item

Fructose

Glucose

Total Sugar***

Calories per 100 grams

Glycemic Index

Sugar*

50%

50%

97%

500

64

Honey

38 to 42%

35 to 40%

80 to 84%

304

62

Date Paste**

32%

34%

70 to 80%

270

103

HFCS

55 to 90%

45 to 10%

100%

370

62

Xagave

47%

17%

64%

308

30 to 35

  • Sugar is actually sucrose, but sucrose, upon consumption breaks down into fructose and glucose in roughly equal parts.
  • *Information was not readily available on date paste, so the author utilized medjool dates as the metric.

*** Total Sugars exceed fructose and glucose because of other sugars such as sucrose and maltose.

Now lets compare the amount of fructose in an apple to Xagave. An average size Fuji Apple (my favorite) weighs between 180 and 300 grams and will contain about 15 to 25 grams of sugar. In a large apple, the 25 grams would be split about 15 to 18 grams of fructose and about 5 to 8 grams of glucose. Two tablespoons of Xagave has about 18 grams of fructose and 3 grams of glucose; thus, two tablespoons of Xagave has about the same fructose of one large apple and less glucose. Lets drill down even further and see how many grams of sugars you would have in one serving of Zucchini Bread on page 49 of Delicious Meets Nutritious -- surprise, it is 1 tablespoon or half the total sugar of an apple!

5. Mr. Mercola claims that it is void of nutrient value. His statement is as follows:
"Nutrient Void. Agave syrup is not a whole food -- it is fractionated and processed, devoid of the nutrients contained in the original, whole plant."
Response: Again, I cannot speak for all agave, but I can for Xagave. Xagave contains inulin, calcium, iron and other vitamins and minerals. One tablespoon of Xagave contains 17% of your daily requirements of calcium. Inulin, a prebiotic fiber, has been shown in numerous studies to improve digestive health, including improved motality, increased calcium absorption, and increased bone density. In addition, in a study by Johns Hopkins University, Inulin was shown to boost your immune system. This study was based upon consumption of 5 grams of inulin per day with 125 persons. The studied showed that the group consuming inulin experienced significantly less diarreha, fever and absentiesm due to illness. Xagave has 2.5 grams per tablespoon. In addition, inulin has been shown to moderate blood sugar levels.

Summary:

Mr. Mercola is so focused on the tree that he misses the forest. Here are the benefits of Xagave, that are based on numbers and objective criteria and supportable. Xagave is sweeter than sugar so you use less and save calories. The caloric savings depends on whether you are cooking, canning or baking but the caloric impact can be significant. I know this for a personal fact because I created most of the recipes in Delicous Meets Nutritious and we, as a company, spent the time calculating the calories in each recipe and compared that to the sugar alternative. For example, our Whole Wheat Pineapple Carrot Cake with Cream Cheese Frosting is 3500 calories less than the traditional sugar recipe and tasted better.

Xagave contains inulin, which the commercial baking industry has been using for years in low fat and low sugar foods to improve the "mouth feel" of foods. This is a little known fact, but in our recipes in Delicious Meets Nutritious you will find that all of our recipes are not only lower in sugar and carbohydrate calories but also lower in fat calories.

Xagave is a low Glycemic Index Food. Xagave is between 30 and 35 on the Glycemic Index and is in the low category. This test was conducted by an independent laboratory -- the actual resorts of the test are copied and incorporated in this article.

Xagave contains Inulin, a prebiotice fiber, that has been shown to improve digestive health. The studies of the benefits of inulin have been conducted by such credible institutions as Johns Hopkins University.

Xagave’s fructose content is lower than sugar, HFCS and roughly equivalent to that of honey and has less glucose and total sugar than all three.

Dr. Mercola's Madness

I have read through Dr. Mercola's article (be careful clicking, it is nearly impossible to browse his site and not be pressured to provide an email address or buy something) and his “references”. What he is saying is misleading to the point of being a menace. Everything needs to be based on pure science, it is dangerous for people like Dr. Mercola to spread kooky stuff that will get people hurt! Go to real studies! Do your own homework! It is as simple as Google-ing “high fructose corn syrup” and finding good clean information from Universities like Yale, American Dietetic Association or real Doctors like Dr. Mark Berkowitz. Do not listen to someone lacking education trying to discount an entire industry.

Let’s get into my own personal reflections of his article entitle “Agave: A Triumph of Marketing over Truth” Under his recommendations: 6-8 servings of fruit and vegetables a day would be very bad for your diabetic or weight management. Since inulin in agave is a soluble fiber, and nearly all of the fruits and vegetables contain fiber, he would have us limit this important nutrient. There is real scientific research available on pure fructose. He is confused about the sourcing and manufacture of pure fructose and this information is available at Staley Manufacturing, along with the scientific studies citing the use of fructose in the diabetic diet. Dr. Keith Berkowitz, a diabetes specialist in New York, has written extensively about the importance of fiber and reduced sugar for weight management and diabetes care. the Nutrition Department at the Yale School of Medicine is also a good source of real science. Estee Foods specialized in diabetic foods and used crystalline fructose as their principal sweetener- with their products endorsed by the American Diabetes Association (they also have a nice breakdown of sweetener options including agave and how to cook with them). Dr. Mercola: there is some kind of basic disconnect here! If you were a food scientist or a M.D. in the nutrition department of a major medical school and were publishing this information, there would be an academic uproar.

There is a branch of the American Dietetic Association - The Diabetic Educators who publish a credible journal. I suggest that you read it. There is considerable information available world-wide regarding the glycemic index (helpful explanation from the American Diabetic Association Here), which has been used in Australia, England and Europe for years in measuring insulin response and glycemic load.

I appreciate that you are pushing other sweeteners and on the net some of those have appalling side-effects, non of which have been proven by the food science or medical community. In my career, I have used every proven product to help diabetics and dieters cope with sugar restriction. My advisers have been a world famous diabetic specialist, diabetic educators, and top food scientists. We all struggle to help patients lose weight with minimum pain, and not compromise their quality of life on the journey. Obesity is more dangerous than most diets ever will be. If obesity can be managed, it will be a giant step forward for mankind.

Your hang-up on fructose is not valid scientifically- since HFCS is NOT the same as fructose. The fruits and vegetables and nuts that supply fructose are not culprits (lo han and erythritol are sourced from fruits.) The downside of some high-intensity sweeteners is that they often deliver an unpleasant aftertaste. Flavor maskers are designed to kill these off-flavors, but they are often chemical and questionable because their ingredients are proprietary and not disclosed.

The "perfect sweetener" has not been created, yet. I and several of my colleagues are working on it. We don't make a move until we have consulted with accredited FOOD SCIENTISTS. I wish Dr. Mercola's references were better. I wish he wouldn't use scare tactics. I wish he knew more about true fructose. And his recommendation of glucose for diabetics is scary. I am in agreement with him that sucrose can be addictive and that it impedes weight loss and encourages weight gain The sugar alcohols- Maltitol, xlitol,erythritol, lactitol and the like are slowly and partially absorbed, resulting in a minimal rise in blood sugar, Stevia, sucralose, lohan kuo, aesculphane K and Tatin-are high intensity and thus no calories and -no blood sugar impact. Fiber, soluble and insoluble are the dieter and diabetic's friend and I cannot watch them be denigrated.

Agave is a natural fructose and fiber product , it tastes good, cooks well and because it is very sweet, less in calorie use. I have been there, done that with all of these ingredients and I LIKE AGAVE!

After I cooled down I did a little research on Dr. Mercola himself, and found out that I am not the first to question his research or ethics, it seems that making false and exaggerated claims is a very lucrative business for Dr. Mercola. Here are a few articles I found in quick search on the web, including the fact that the FDA investigated him for falsely labeling his products without approval or research.


http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/mercola.html


http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/may2006/sb20060523_063274.htm


Official FDA Letters to Dr. Mercola: Warning about Claims, Inspection of Labels and Drug Claims